My words were spoken from a certain "delusional fag" persona I often inhabit.
More you might like
while this creature's appearance and given name may confuse you this is not in fact a goose. the trick is to examine the facial area. a clever hint that the creature is not what it presumes to be is the absence of a beak. feathers are another vital feature to study closely. at first glance the first image above gives the appearance of delicate feathers however the second image reveals the telltale details of fur. lastly geese usually have two legs rather than four. perhaps if there were two geese in the box there might be four legs peeking out. although that would require a second beak as well. the only conclusion can be that this creature is neither one goose nor two geese. were it the case that this was a goose it would likely find the box a quite charming and comfortable abode however.
but the box says..? 🤨














